Escher Girls

Float like a butterfly, Sting like a WTF!?

This is a blog to archive and showcase the prevalence of certain ways women are depicted in illustrated pop media, specifically how women are posed, drawn, distorted, and/or sexualized out of context, often in ridiculous, impossible or disturbing ways that sacrifice storytelling.

See the "About" section in the sidebar for more details.

(All art featured on this blog belongs to their respective artists)

Thoughts & Opinions from Commenters, Disqus Mods, & Submitters are their own & do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of this site.

contact: eschergirls@gmail.com

Please read submitting and commenting guidelines (sidebar) before doing either.

RocketRoach submitted:

deannambrigman redraw

I felt this sentiment before, during all those Darkchylde “wake up” redraws, but not strongly enough to actually express it: sometimes (often) these bad comic book poses are simply un-salvageable.

I don’t need to explain on this blog how, a successful illustration should be able to communicate with the viewer even without words; and that posing, both in real life and (to a lesser degree) in art, is dictated by physics, anatomy and gesture/intent, right? 

Well then, what the heck is Spider-woman (whom I know next to nothing about) supposed to be doing?



Is she flying/gliding? (figure 1): both her hair torso and head disagree.

Is she leaping off a building? (like Spider-man would, figure 2):  the motion blurred leg suggests that, but the her upper body and flame trail rule that out.

Is she dropping down on purpose? (figure 3): this is the only interpretation in which both her “wings” and hair make sense, but suicidal pose aside (trying to land or your feet is just not sexy, I guess), the motion blur is going in the wrong direction.

Trying to “fix” this train-wreck is like trying to make the Guernica anatomically correct without changing the composition: a waste of time.

Even for the sake of self improvement, (something I’m struggling with as well), I think that, sometimes, coming up with a completely new pose that actually makes sense would be much more useful, IMHO.

Sorry for the awkward English.

I think in the original she was meant to be diving during flight.  My original caption was that she was killed and fell out of a plane.  I still can’t see that picture as anything else. xD

I really like your breakdowns though, and how each possibility is confused by the contradictory motion blurring and hair/wing effects. Having a solid idea of the context and how that affects what you plan to draw is really important.


habaneropepperpotts submitted:


(Credits: Invincible Iron Man v3 #21. Artist is Mark Bagley. Character is Carol Danvers aka Warbird.) In this shot, Carol is doing an excellent impression of a centaur. A ridiculously top-heavy centaur and I’m not even talking about her breasts. It’s also close to a boobs and butt pose but not quite.

Captain Centaur to the rescue!

(Credits: Invincible Iron Man v3 #21. Artist is Mark Bagley. Character is Carol Danvers aka Warbird.) In this shot, Carol is doing an excellent impression of a centaur. A ridiculously top-heavy centaur and I’m not even talking about her breasts. It’s also close to a boobs and butt pose but not quite.

Captain Centaur to the rescue!